On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 09:47:26AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 12:49:01PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > I was trying to answer the question "How is the license of Fedora as a > > whole advertised?" (e.g. in the sense of what can I do with an ISO image > > I download from https://getfedora.org/en/workstation/download/). > > Do we specify how the whole collection is licensed anywhere? > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Licenses/LicenseAgreement?rd=Legal/Licenses/LicenseAgreement > > "Fedora is a compilation of software packages, each under its own license. > The compilation itself is released under the MIT license. However, this > compilation license does not supersede the licenses of code and content > contained in Fedora, which conform to the legal guidelines described at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing."; Thanks, this is useful. Shouldn't this be prominently linked from https://getfedora.org/ though? The only link on gf.o is to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Main#Legal which does include the link to Legal:Licenses, which includes a link to Legal:Licenses/LicenseAgreement. My worry is that even though *you* and *I* know the license of Fedora is, a "random" person should not be expected to go through 3 links and a legal text to find the license. For comparison: * https://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/ has three panes, and the third one is "terms & conditons" and includes an obvious link to a license. * https://software.opensuse.org/distributions/tumbleweed has a (not very visible but easily seen when one scrolls down a bit) link to https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:License which contains fairly clear legalese. * https://www.ubuntu.com/download/desktop is possibly even harder to navigate than us (https://www.ubuntu.com/legal links to https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies which says "Our intellectual property rights policy lets you use, modify and redistribute Ubuntu. It also outlines how you can use our trademarks, design assets and other copyrighted materials." which is slightly nauseating in itself, which then links to https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/intellectual-property-policy which is full of crap. Our website may be hard to navigate, but at least we don't pretend we wrote and own all free software.) * https://www.debian.org/distrib/ has a link to https://www.debian.org/intro/free which is a wall of text, which afaict doesn't even answer the question in $subject. This is all slightly disappointing. Proprietary software is much better about putting up clear information about licensing. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
