We have had a long discussion about hibernate (suspend to disk) being unreliable. But there seems to be no hard data. Let's gather some! If you perform hibernation (systemctl hibernate, or the equivalent through the GUI), does _your_ system suspend and resume correctly? Note: I'm not talking about the user-space configuration issues (resume= not set on the kernel command line, no swap, swap encrypted with temporary keys, whatever), but only about any potential kernel driver issues. My stats (with various version of Fedora): – thinkpad x1c 4th gen: no issues – thinkpad x1c 3rd gen: no issues – thinkpad x230: no issues – chromebook 2013 model: spurious wakeups after the lid was closed – thinkpad t50: no issues (*) – hp pavilion dv7: no issues (*) So in my own experience, s2d usually works. Does it work for you? Zbyszek (*) on this older hardware is where I used hibernation a lot, on the newer ones, not that much. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
