Re: Orphaning some Java packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Gerald Henriksen wrote:
> 
> 
> what rule is that?
> 
> -- Rex

Maybe our guidelines [*] about bundling and duplication is threatened with modularity.
Last but not least, if there's a CVE or soname bump in whatever library, we'd need to rebuild the whole modularity stack depending. That would mean to request more traffic to the end users with all the updates, this coordination needs communication.
Without modularity, we've to just rebuild the affected library package(s) in case of CVE and it'd be mostly done.

Of course, we shouldn't base the process on one or two maintainers only to be expected to handle the whole dependencies stack, java packaging is indeed a good example.

Regards, Raphael

[*] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Bundling_and_Duplication_of_system_libraries
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux