On Thu, 24 Feb 2005, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 16:32 -0500, Elliot Lee wrote: > >Yea, that split was crack. > > Splitting the documentation packages out into a separate SRPM from the > Exim binaries makes a lot of sense -- the docs are distributed > separately, updated at different times, and built into a separate RPM > package which should have been noarch. There is no overlap between them > and the Exim dæmon itself. There was never any real reason for them to > be inside the main exim SRPM in the first place. The point in fixing > that now was to make it easier to drop the docs¹ if it was really > necessary to make space, because upgrades won't suffer just due to the > docs being older. Yea, the split was not crack. ;-) -- Elliot
