Le samedi 22 septembre 2018 à 11:38 -0700, Adam Williamson a écrit : > > But at the same time I think Matt's right that comps -at least as it's > currently set up - is kind of a really *bad* way of doing this, and > that seems fairly well demonstrated by the problem I'm trying to solve > - that comps has tons of broken entries in it. Just from looking > through the file as I do this, I really suspect that no-one is > maintaining quite a lot of the groups and the packages in them may > well just not make much sense any more. That's a QA problem But really, the problem is not the comps format, it's that any kind of classification activity is both tedious and optional (if you know how to classify a package you do not need the classification in the first place), rots fast in presence of high package churn, and can only work long term with lots of janitorial involvement (both human and automated). Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
