Re: Semi-serious proposal: drop all optional entries from comps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 10:26 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 09/21/2018 06:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> ...snip...
> > The old gnome-packagekit, IIRC, also parsed groups and showed you all
> > this stuff.
> > 
> > But...we don't do that any more. anaconda does not expose 'optional'
> > packages in any way any more (you can only pick environment groups and
> > their supplementary package groups in anaconda, now). GNOME Software
> > doesn't either.
> 
> There's one other place they are used (although perhaps not much):
> dnf group install --with-optional groupname
> will install the group and all the optional stuff.
> 
> I have no idea if many people use that...

I am betting it's just about zero, because it seems really unlikely
that anyone wants *all* of the optional packages in a group. That's
kinda why they were made optional in the first place, presumably. So I
didn't mention this, though you're right that it technically exists.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux