On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 21:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 06:14:51PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > So do we really need these acres of 'optional' packages in comps? I > > mean, there are 2519 of them in comps-f30.xml.in. That's a lot. I > > suspect no-one's looked whether most of them make any sense for years. > > There are entire groups that are *nothing but optional packages*, > > making them almost entirely useless. > > +1, drop 'em. > > Long (or, in my dreams, medium) term, I want to see the things that are now > "Labs" be instead software bundles that can be installed via GNOME Software > and other tools. When you say 'software bundle' are you thinking of some specific mechanism here, or just the vague concept? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
