Re: Semi-serious proposal: drop all optional entries from comps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2018-09-21 at 21:55 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 06:14:51PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > So do we really need these acres of 'optional' packages in comps? I
> > mean, there are 2519 of them in comps-f30.xml.in. That's a lot. I
> > suspect no-one's looked whether most of them make any sense for years.
> > There are entire groups that are *nothing but optional packages*,
> > making them almost entirely useless.
> 
> +1, drop 'em.
> 
> Long (or, in my dreams, medium) term, I want to see the things that are now
> "Labs" be instead software bundles that can be installed via GNOME Software
> and other tools.

When you say 'software bundle' are you thinking of some specific
mechanism here, or just the vague concept?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux