Dne 17.9.2018 v 09:48 Haïkel napsal(a): > Le lun. 17 sept. 2018 à 08:12, Mattia Verga <mattia.verga@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit : >>> Le dim. 16 sept. 2018 à 11:27, Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com> a écrit : >>> >>> >>> The policy mention that you have to try contacting the maintainer >>> *first*, you never sent me an email or pinged me on irc. >>> I don't like this kind of passive-aggressive approach, had you >>> contacted me, we would have sorted this out quickly, co-maintainers >>> are welcome. >>> >>> One more thing, when you want to contact someone in the project => >>> <username>(a)fedoraproject.org should always work. >>> >>> Regards, >>> H. >>> >> Trying to contact the maintainer directly before opening the unresponsive maintainer policy and reply to bugs via email is right, BUT I would expect bugzilla to be the first contact point and so maintainers should respond in bugzilla first, not via email. >> >> Sometimes a "bug aknowledge, but it's in low priority list" message can keep users calm... >> >> Mattia > (On the policy) > > Yes, first attempt should be through bugzilla, but we are human > beings, so it happens that a direct ping is necessary. Haïkel, you might be upset that somebody calls you "Possibly non-responsive", but frankly, if the message from Fabio was passive-aggressive to you, then I am not sure you did better job then he did (especially in the "we are human beings" context). Vít > The policy may be subject to interpretation, but it hints that this > process should be used when you *cannot* reach the maintainer. > If you have time to mail the list, you have time to mail the person first. > > "and asks if anyone knows how to contact the maintainer." => It's > crystal clear (to me at least) that it assumes that you could not > reach the > maintainer through the email registered in FAS (we used to have > regular pings from the system to verify that users are still > monitoring these). > > If you want access to a package that I happen to be a "Point of > Contact" (which is semantically different that owner and it's on > purpose), just ask. > Nobody owns anything in Fedora. > > Regards, > H. > > >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
