Re: Testing / feedback request: DNF 3 crashes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 16:33 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2018 at 09:16:54AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-09-12 at 06:27 +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 12:26:09PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > Hi folks!
> > > > 
> > > > Around the time DNF 3 landed in Rawhide (hence F29), we had quite a few
> > > > folks on these lists reporting issues, including crasher bugs. Many of
> > > > these seemed somehow related to the DNF history database. They also
> > > > were not easy to isolate and fix.
> > > > 
> > > > We're now close to the F29 Beta release, but we don't have a great
> > > > sense of how many people are still having these problems with DNF 3.2
> > > > or 3.3.
> > > > 
> > > > Can anyone who is still struggling with DNF crashes on *basic*
> > > > operations on F29 or Rawhide please reply, and provide a few details on
> > > > what you're seeing and any workarounds or fixes you've found?
> > > 
> > > I filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627694 yesterday.
> > > The gist is that dnf stopped having locking around the rpm operation,
> > > so it'll fail if two operations are invoked concurrently. Before it'd
> > > very nicely do the downloads in parallel and then run the actual installations
> > > sequentially. I think this is a huge regression in usability.
> > 
> > Thanks. Doesn't really look like a Beta blocker, though.
> 
> It doesn't. I don't even think it'd be a Final blocker. Just unpleasant.
> 
> > > I also saw some "TransactionItem not found" messages, but this has already
> > > been reported extensively.
> > 
> > On what operation? We have:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1625259
> > for encountering them on downgrade or 'history undo' type operations.
> > If you hit one on upgrade or install, that'd be worse.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1627534
> 
> I marked it as duplicate, to avoid noise. Mikhail reported it during 'history undo',
> but I saw during 'dnf upgrade'.

That seems significantly worse to me. I'm going to propose the bug as a
blocker and request input from dnf team. Thanks.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux