Re: RFC: Alternative -devel packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 13:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le 2018-08-07 17:33, Adam Jackson a écrit :
> > Consider a library like libGL. At runtime, you want the drivers it
> > might load to be installed. But when building an application, you just
> > need the library itself. If the drivers themselves have non-trivial
> > dependencies, the buildroot is more likely to fail to compose.
> 
> That's a boostraping problem. The general solution is to make our build 
> tools bootstrap aware, so they activate bootstrap mode as needed 
> automatically, instead of forcing packagers to switch the conditional 
> manually in spec files each time a bootstraping situation arises.

If you consider buildroot size to be a metric to be reduced - and
clearly people do, see BuildRequires: gcc - then this is not just a
bootstrapping issue.

Is there a proposal anywhere for the kind of bootstrap awareness you
describe?

- ajax
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux