On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 01:40:00PM +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote: > On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 18:24 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 01:00 -0300, Pedro Fernandes Macedo wrote: > > >I dont want to make this a sendmail/postfix/exim/other email server war, > > >but I think that is a little too much... > > >Just because one distribution ships exim/koffice/put your favourite app > > >here as default , it doesnt necessarily mean that's the right choice for > > >all distributions. > > > > That's true, but in this case Debian happens to have it right. We should > > do what Debian does here because they're _right_, not just because > > they're doing it and we have to follow. > > In that case I would be curious about the reasons which make exim more > "right" than say postfix, otherwise it's only an "everyone wants his pet > MTA" thing. The config file is more stable and the way they maintain the package more longterm. That's what I heard. greetings, Florian La Roche