Suppose I am main admin of a package which I would like to orphan in release branches, but keep maintaining the package in arbitrary [1] branches, which are used for building modules. Would this considered as a valid approach? How should I handle orphaning the package in this case? I can think of at least two possibilities: 1. Keep myself as admin and set bugzilla_contact for product Fedora to orphan. 2. Set orphan as main admin and demote myself to just admin. In case no one adopts orphaned package and it is retired by Release Engineering, should commiters be still able to commit to non-retired arbitrary branches? I assume yes, but I'd rather ask in advance. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ArbitraryBranching -- Mikolaj Izdebski Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat IRC: mizdebsk _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx