On 08/23/2018 12:31 AM, Artur Iwicki wrote: > If we remove the Group: tag from existing packages (assuming 100% accuracy), this would mean that the only way for a package to have the Group: tag would be to: > a) have a maintainer add it back in > b) accept a new package with the Group: tag present > > If we assume option a) to be unlikely, Oh, don't assume anything like that. Some maintainers (mentioned on this list in other threads earlier) have proven record of re-adding Group after removal. > then wouldn't it make more sense to put the "doesn't have a Group: tag" check in fedora-review, instead of rpmlint? Fedora-Review doesn't need to be run during package review. It's not even recommended in review guidelines. On the other hand running rpmlint is mandatory, it's the very first MUST item in the guidelines. -- Mikolaj Izdebski Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat IRC: mizdebsk _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/GLBWOUMW4MQVA4RT2HLIQVSRCJM65CRT/
