Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21.8.2018 02:01, Amit Saha wrote:


On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 8:19 PM Christian Dersch <lupinix.fedora@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:lupinix.fedora@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

    Am Di., 14. Aug. 2018 um 15:41 Uhr schrieb Marek Kasik
    <mkasik@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mkasik@xxxxxxxxxx>>:



        On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
         > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik
        <mkasik@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mkasik@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
         >
         >> Hi,
         >>
         >> I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now.
         >>
         >> There are several API changes and soname bump of the base
        library
         >> libpoppler.so.*.
         >>
         >> I've checked all packages which depend on the
        libpoppler.so.* and have
         >> backported/prepared fixes to reflect poppler's API changes.
         >>
         >> Unfortunately, libreoffice does not build currently
        (#1615616). But I've
         >> decided to push the rebase though because branching will
        happen today
         >> and I could not do chain build after that for F29.
         >>
         >> Btw, if your package use the unstable API (headers from
        poppler-devel),
         >> could you consider to change it to use a stable API (glib,
        qt, C++)?
         >>
         >>
         >>
         > Please do not push this change today. We are going to branch
        F29 and I'd
         > really like to not see a whole lot of breakage at the same time.
         >
         > It would be best to work out the kinks in Rawhide and then
        merge them all
         > at once to F29 between Branching and Beta Freeze.

        Hi,

        I've already pushed the change to rawhide at night. The only
        problems
        are LibreOffice and GDAL now. They don't build from source even
        without
        the rebase of poppler.
        I'm looking at the GDAL now and I see that Caolan has pushed new
        LibreOffice to rawhide.


    Any news on gdal? This breaks three of the Fedora Spins: Astronomy,
    Robotic and Scientific. So please fix this asap! And please
    coordinate that better next time, poppler is known to break things…
    Pushing that before branching (and mostly without announcement,
    because there was no time to test) was not a good idea :(


Thanks for raising.  Asking for Fedora Scientific - should I comment out packages which needs gdal?

There is a PR open for gdal: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdal/pull-request/7

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/XC7ZZJU2TUNINZTXL7TOF7WCXAYNHSLL/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux