Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 08/15/2018 05:16 AM, Radka Janekova wrote: >> >> mono-devel packages are far behind upstream, and the mono-sig seems >> unresponsive as whole. This leads me to a question, do we have a >> maintainer for mono? >> >> I can take a look at it within the next month or two if there really >> isn't anyone else... > > Radka, > > Yes, mono is behind, but it isn't a simple reason. The way mono is > bootstrapped and compiled has changed starting with version 5.0. The > Roslyn compiler is now the default and requires bootstrapping from > binary-only sources provided by upstream. This is a no-no in > Fedora. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Committee?rd=Packaging:Committee#Bootstrapping_Exception_Procedure > > Follow along here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1436896 > > Thanks, > Michael > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/4L2SB3KIT3MDXNIDOIPW6BLQUX35WM4H/ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/7IHXPEP6ISMVRDFWBCHQJXJT2DWV7LVL/
