On Sat, 2018-07-21 at 18:52 +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote: > The elfutils tools can demangle C++ symbols through the standard > _cxa_demangle interface. The elfutils tools are written in C and > so simply link with -lstdc++ to get access to __cxa_demangle. > > There is a BuildRequires: libstdc++-devel in the elfutils.spec. > But it looks like that isn't enough anymore to pull in libstdc++.so > to build against. > > It looks like that is provided through a symlink in gcc-c++. > Should the elfutils.spec just BuildRequires: gcc-c++ instead of > libstdc++-devel? Or is this a packaging/requires issue somewhere > else? Just in case anybody else is wondering what the correct answer is. Whether libstdc++.so is provided by by gcc-c++ or libstdc++-devel is architecture dependent. libstdc++-devel is there for multilib reasons. You should just depend on gcc-c++ if you need to link against libstdc++.so. Even if you don't use g++ to link against it. gcc-c++ requires libstdc++-devel. Cheers, Mark _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/ZK47BQOLXNLPNRYU6YTTOB246FXWEQK6/
