Re: dnf history - change in how rpmdb checksum is computed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The real problem is that both E:N-V-R.A and N-E:V-R.A  are equally imprecise.

The concept of "reproducible builds/installs" requires much more complete identifiers for serious work. But that was not the question asked in this thread.

So calculating both checksums, on rearranged plaintext items, for compatibility, kinda misses the underlying need to verify system installs on hundreds of machines.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/G5PQ6DZKLVJJYPJCQG2VVQQMRAITETJ3/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux