On 07/17/2018 04:35 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote: ...snip... > > We want to keep them and we are able to maintain Python 2 for them > (well, we would very much prefer to have them ported to Python 3 but we > realize it's not always happening.) Well, if something is broken in python2, breaking one of the packages you want to maintain it for, likely it's broken for other packages too? But I see what you mean... One of the reasons I suggested modules was that it would take concrete work for packages that still need python2 to become modular and depend on a python2 module, making it easier to just retire everything in the main collection that doesn't take any action. I think without that you are back to a whitelist... "all python2 dependent packages will be retired in F30, except the ones on this list" and you will have to detect those. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/WSXR3MHI3G3TFE34LBKTVZF6VLFHTYJG/
