David Woodhouse wrote: > I'm far more adamant about "it shouldn't be sendmail" than "it should be > exim" but sendmail definitely needs to go, and on balance I think Exim > would make a better choice than Postfix, because it's so much better > documented. OTOH I think, that exim4's configuration files are close to unreadable and far to many parentheses in it. If you want to use a simple MTA as default mailer, I'd opt to go to postfix - but I am biased, because I switched from Exim3 to Exim4, as I disliked some of the new configuration stuff (especially its readability, as stated above). As to documentation: postfix 2.1 is very well documented, the documentation cannot be compared to what was delivered with 2.0 or earlier. But that's just me. Regards, Ralph
Attachment:
pgpFvj7OHVTVQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
