Re: F29 System Wide Change: OpenLDAP without Non-threaded Libraries

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, July 17, 2018 2:24:04 PM CEST Matus Honek wrote:
> Florian is right, the idea is to make changes to the source code
> (probably a downstream patch will be needed) such that the threaded
> library will be built twice, once with libldap soname and once with
> libldap_r soname, and the non-threaded libldap won't be shipped at
> all.
> 
> The non-threaded version basically provides a subset of capabilities of
> the threaded version, which are additionally thread safe
> (i.e. mutexes). There shouldn't be really any noticeable change.
> 
> Does this make sense?

So can it happen that both the libraries will be loaded at the same time
by a single process (one of them for example through libcurl)?

Will everything work as expected in this case?

Kamil

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/ZSJ5XRXEZAX5WTIJCQWPO3GU6SO3IZSV/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux