Re: Lots a permission denied activity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 14:27 -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have been testing a new set of audit rules and have run across
> some 
> processes that are doing things that might out to be changed.
> Typically, 
> audit users expect a normally functioning system to not be noisy.
> There is a 
> requirement to audit failed file access due to permission denied.
> What I'm 
> finding is that two processes are generating tens of thousands of
> events 
> every day.
> 
> There is a /usr/libexec/tracker-extract process that searches my
> directories 
> about every 11 seconds. I can imagine on a laptop that would be a lot
> of disk 
> activity. Sometimes I use root in my home directory and accidentally
> create 
> files owned by root. This leads to a lots of events on my system.
> Does it 
> really need to run with this frequency?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1271872

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=747689 (closed as fixed !?!
)  yet today someone also complains about tracker 





> But I also see one that I just don't understand. Every 12 seconds,
> /usr/lib/
> systemd/systemd calls openat with write flags to open 
> 
> /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu/cgroup.procs
> /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuacct/cgroup.procs
> /sys/fs/cgroup/blkio/cgroup.procs
> /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/user.slice/user-4325.slice/user@4325.service/
> cgroup.procs
> /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/user.slice/user-4325.slice/cgroup.procs
> /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/user.slice/cgroup.procs
> /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/cgroup.procs
> /sys/fs/cgroup/devices/user.slice/cgroup.procs
> /sys/fs/cgroup/devices/cgroup.procs
> /sys/fs/cgroup/pids/user.slice/user-4325.slice/user@4325.service/cgro
> up.procs
> /sys/fs/cgroup/pids/user.slice/user-4325.slice/cgroup.procs
> /sys/fs/cgroup/pids/user.slice/cgroup.procs
> /sys/fs/cgroup/pids/cgroup.procs
> 
> Which are all root owned files. This adds up to about 45,000 events a
> day. Is 
> there a purpose to opening those files? And if that was truly needed,
> should 
> it be logging failures? Are the permissions wrong? If the failures
> are 
> benign, why is it doing it at all?
> 
> Thanks,
> -Steve
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelin
> es
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@li
> sts.fedoraproject.org/message/2HMJ4SX3UP22ASPI34YK6JOKEM2X5NYN/
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/7I3FZI2GBROJ6CGTIIGOTRTR5U6RHBC7/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux