Re: Packages which needlessly use %defattr

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 02:35:39AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > "%defattr(-,root,root,-)" as the initial line in a %files section even
> > though this has not been needed for well over a decade now.  This
> > construct even appears in new specfiles, perhaps because it appears in
> > so many existing packages.
> Why is that a problem? The line will have no effect. So why can't we just 
> leave it there?

The general argument for removing unnecessary esoterica from spec files
is that it makes them easier to read for correctness and much easier
for new people to get involved.

-- 
Matthew Miller
<mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fedora Project Leader
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/DEUYKVUWR7ZCZ6XXAZXZKJ4OU3JIGZXL/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux