On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 02:21:58PM +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > - pkcon ? > > - Gnome Software ? > I've been talking internally about this. The idea is for pkcon and > GNOME Software to have a superficial view of what modules are, but not > to actually expose all the nitty-gritty detail. It's on my radar to > make this work correctly. I think I said this elsewhere in this thread, but it doesn't hurt to repeat. :) I think this generally makes sense, because I don't expect modules to be the primary means through which users select different streams of graphical applications. For that kind of thing, Flatpak (or, Neal, Snaps) make sense. And GNOME Software only does GUI apps anyway. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/XCY5QANOZ2TX6JW6SEQKIWIPPFE465CX/
