On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 04:25:16PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 02:54:07PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote: > > > IMHO deprecate != remove, but rather mark for removal in some next release. > > > Should the change be called differently? > > Especially since Yum has been called "yum-deprecated" for several > > releases already. > > How about "Replace Yum 3 with Yum 4, powered by DNF"? This would bring > us in line with what's happening in the Enterprise Linux space. I'd prefer to replace "powered by" with some simple non-ambiguous wording. "powered by" might mean that yum calls dnf under the hood, or some other complicated relationship. "YUM4/DNF" can be used to underline that they are the same thing. What about just calling the change "Fully replace yum3 with dnf / yum4" and having a sentence like "DNF and YUM4 are the same thing" ? Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/U4VXTW5DXA73DXTRNAV4T7RHWF66OMS2/
