On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:49:39PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 02:37:07PM -0700, Gerald B. Cox wrote: > > If we're keeping both commands, I don't really care - but to make > > sure I'm understanding this, we're proposing to eliminate the yum > > code, create a symlink for yum pointing to dnf and then change our > > documentation to no longer reference dnf - only reference yum? > > That's my suggestion, although "no longer reference dnf" is a bit > strong. We'd use `yum` as the standard command in documentation about > package management, but detailed documentation would talk about "yum > powered by dnf". After half a decade of using dnf? It's aready ingrained in my muscle memory and some of my ansible scripts. Flipping the name of most important command every few years is really counter-productive, yum→dnf transition was painful enough. I'm against inflicting such self-harm again. -- Tomasz Torcz There exists no separation between gods and men: xmpp: zdzichubg@xxxxxxxxx one blends softly casual into the other. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/ZK5U46K7N5SBG45YW4ZQ4JZLWZLIVZGO/
