Re: Unified Unison package (again)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 31/05/18 13:31, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:

Although this is very slightly dubious from a packaging point of view,
I believe it's the best solution here.  It means we can build multiple
versions, we don't need to go through the new package review process
every time upstream releases a new major version, and it'll make
managing the package simpler at the cost of a somewhat more complex
spec file.

So long as the different versions don't conflict you don't actually
need a new review to package a different version - there is now an
automatic exception for that:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_Process

and:

https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/637

Tom

--
Tom Hughes (tom@xxxxxxxxxx)
http://compton.nu/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/H3ZWZMIZUNRHHHEKYRXFBGPWSUY7PECL/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux