Re: [fesco] Updated FTBFS package policy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 01:53:28PM +0200, Jiri Vanek wrote:

> The second one is pretty strong one. Does it incue system packages too? If
> so, note that it can be hard to adapt some packages to new GCC or (in
> future) new JDK11 in short interval of two mass rebuilds.

The short interval is usually six months (not that short) and I guess if
an important package cannot be rebuilt because of a new GCC or JDK, we
need a compatibility package to make sure the package can still be
built.

Kind regards
Till
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/J3QG4SXGN2CTGBNHUG54DBBY7DUK6MNZ/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux