Re: F29 System Wide Change: Move /usr/bin/python into a separate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > Couldn't we accomplish the same
> > thing by doing a side build against a modified python2 package but not
> > propagate that out to the users?
> 
> How does that force the maintainers to fix the packages? We tried to check
> what packages use /usr/bin/python during build. There is a huge warning in
> the build log and a failed Taskotron check if the package uses it. Nobody
> (or close to nobody) cared.

Was a case made to make this test gate packages in bodhi?
While the gating is being currently re-worked, I believe this would be a
sensible test to enforce gating. Anyone waiving it and not fixing it in the next
update would be basically saying: I do not want to follow the guidelines which
can lead to another discussion than: I was not aware of this.

I only saw that test in the update tab of a bodhi update because I was looking
for something else, I didn't know until then that we had a test for it... :(


Pierre
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/GGD7DRK23M6QIUKXODH7MH5GDPA54M4E/




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux