On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 02:38:13PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 17:54 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > > > > > > "ES" == Eric Smith <spacewar@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > ES> What macro(s) should I use in an RPM spec to refer to a directory > > ES> like /usr/lib/modules-load.d, which is under /usr/lib even if > > libdir > > ES> is /usr/lib64? Is there something better than > > ES> %{_usr}/lib/modules-load.d? > > > > It seems that there isn't. I would just use /usr/lib/modules-load.d > > directly. > > > > You will get an rpmlint complaint about direct use of /usr/lib, I > > suppose. Not much to be done about that. Technically a macro for > > this > > could be added, but only a few packages need to do this so I suspect > > it > > wouldn't be worth it. > > from VirtualBox.spec we use : > > %{_prefix}/lib/modules-load.d/ https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/9036 Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/message/LH273KKFRSSDZECHV6HWMXZNZOVOVGUI/