Re: rubygem-liquid update to 4.0.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Sure,
I think we can take my spec from copr[0], which I've worked on with vondruch. Proper feature tests won't run until we get cucumber >= 3 to Fedora, but that shouldn't matter.

What should be fixed is spec test - it is currently failing on some test cases. However, current version of jekyll in Fedora does not run any tests at all right now, so I guess it won't be big deal if some of them will be failing.

I can be co-maintainer if you want, just notice that my ruby knowledge is limited :D .

[0] http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/frantisekz/fedora-developer-portal/rubygem-jekyll.git/tree/rubygem-jekyll.spec

On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 3:50 PM, Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 3:29 PM Frantisek Zatloukal <fzatlouk@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Hi,
> I've tried to get updated rubygem-jekyll to fedora few months ago. It
stalled on old liquid unfortunately[0].

I am in the CC list for that bug, and I too saw that there was no progress.
I have recently taken over maintainership of rubygem-liquid when it was
orphaned, and I plan to update the package to the latest 4.0.0 release in
rawhide, as I said.

> I've been building new versions of rubygem-jekyll in my COPR[1] from time
to time.

Oh, nice, I didn't know that. Maybe we can push this forward together?

I tried again and added the current jekyll maintainer to the discussion
with a different mail address, maybe he can respond.

Fabio

> [0]
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/frantisekz/fedora-developer-portal/
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470699

> On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:56 AM, Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>> Hi all,

>> I am planning to update the rubygem-liquid package (which was orphaned,
and then taken by me) to the latest upstream release, 4.0.0.

>> This will break the current (really outdated) rubygem-jekyll package,
which depends on liquid < 4. I have reached out to rubygem-jekyll-owner
(which should be besser82) to help with bringing jekyll up-to-date (or to
take over maintaining the package, because it looks kind of abandoned) two
weeks ago (April 23), but I have not heard back since.

>> What is the procedure to follow here? I don't want to just push the
update and break stuff.

>> Fabio

>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org




> --

> Best regards / S pozdravem,

> František Zatloukal
> Associate Quality Engineer
> Red Hat
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@lists.fedoraproject.org



--

Best regards / S pozdravem,

František Zatloukal
Associate Quality Engineer
Red Hat
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux