Re: Adding Obsoletes to generated -debuginfo packages ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 6:10 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> In libvirt we recently deleted a driver for the legacy Xen toolstack.

> This was shipped in a libvirt-daemon-driver-xen RPM.

> I am able to add an "Obsoletes: libvirt-daemon-driver-xen < 4.3.0"
> line to the libvirt-daemon-driver-libxl RPM, which gives  clean
> upgrade path for users.

> If they have the libvirt-daemon-driver-xen-debuginfo RPM installed
> though that still breaks the upgrade.

> How can I get the auto-generated libvirt-daemon-driver-libxl-debuginfo
> RPM to have an "Obsoletes: libvirt-daemon-driver-xen-debuginfo < 4.3.0"
> statement ? It seems impossible, meaning users with debuginfo have a
> broken upgrade path. An unfortunate consequence of switching to seprate
> -debuginfo per sub-RPM.


How is this creating upgrade problems? debuginfo packages do not require
the main packages at all.


-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux