Re: GCC 8.1.1 broken in rawhide due to annobin

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2018-05-03 at 13:12 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 12:05:55PM +0000, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 8:03 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > GCC just updated in Fedora rawhide from 8.0.1 to 8.1.1 and is unable to
> > > create executables due to annobin:
> > 
> > 
> > > configure:6112: gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
> > 
> > -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions
> > -fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches
> > -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1
> > -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic
> > -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection
> >    -Wl,-z,relro  -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld
> > conftest.c  >&5
> > > annobin: conftest.c: Error: plugin built for compiler version (8.1.1) but
> > 
> > run with compiler version (8.0.1)
> > > cc1: error: fail to initialize plugin
> > 
> > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/8/plugin/annobin.so
> > 
> > > See
> > >    https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8382/26748382/build.log
> > >    https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574478
> > > Obviously annobin needs rebuilding, but more generally how can be fix this
> > > long term so that future Gcc updates don't continually break due to
> > 
> > annobin
> > > mis-match ?
> > 
> > 
> > Since we don't have reverse dep auto-rebuilding capabilities, just add the
> > plugin sources to the gcc package and build it in there. It's pretty clear
> > by this point that the maintainers can't be bothered to make sure that both
> > gcc and annobin are updated together so that everything doesn't break.
> > 
> > Sorry for the bluntness, but I'm getting tired of the compiler getting
> > broken because of this plugin.
> 
> I think we also need some automated test that validates
> 
>  "can create executables with standard RPM build flags"
> 
> that is a blocking test before gcc RPMs get pushed into repos since this
> is a critical package dep for so much of Fedora.

That could probably be done in %check in the gcc package itself...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux