On 03/12/2018 04:48 AM, Milan Crha wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2018-03-12 at 12:10 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 11:33:36AM +0100, Milan Crha wrote: >>> On Fri, 2018-03-09 at 11:35 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>>> Sure, with this proposal you would: >>>> >>>> * request a side tag >>>> * build a, wait for it to be added to the repo, build b, etc. >>>> You would not need to file overrides, just build them in the >>>> right order with wait-repo between them. >>> >> Tooling can be built no? Why do you assume we can't make chain-build >> work with side-tags? > > That wasn't my suggestion, that's what Kevin Fenzi suggested and I sort > of questioned it. :) To be clear I didn't suggest chain build wouldn't work, I just outlined a workflow I could see myself using. I suspect chain build would work on a side tag just fine with --target passed to it. But of course we would want to test and note this use case. So, thanks for bringing it up... kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx