On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 15:47 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > On 03/08/2018 03:25 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > On 2018-03-08 17:05, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 14:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > While rebuilding stuff for "GCC 8 ABI change on x86_64", I noticed we > > > > have a rather magnificent collection of ancient llvm versions: > > > > > > > > llvm34 > > > > llvm35 > > > > llvm3.9 > > > > llvm4.0 > > > > llvm5.0 > > > > > > > > None of these is retired (llvm33 and llvm3.7 also exist, but *are* > > > > retired). llvm34 and llvm35 don't build successfully and haven't for > > > > some time. The more recent ones mostly look like they should build, > > > > except they have issues with exhausting RAM on the i686 and armhfp > > > > builders. > > > > > > > > Do we actually need all of these for anything? Can we kill some of > > > > them? > > > > > > AFAICS, nothing at all uses these: > > > > You have to look at the -libs subpackage too. > > Or -devel if you're querying BuildRequires. > > Rust currently builds with llvm5.0-devel, but I should be able to move > it to the base llvm (6.0) for its next release. Thanks, all of you. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
