On 03/06/2018 10:30 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > In the past we required a proven tester to sign off on testing a > critpath package to provide extra assurance that the update worked and > did not break critical functionality. I do not believe that we are > using proven testers any longer. Having some requirements on automated > testing for critpath I think could be useful. I would suggest that we > look at how we could reuse it to a different purpose rather than > throwing it out. Interesting, so it had a purpose in the past but nothing uses it anymore. We do have requirements for critical path packages to reach a certain level of normal karma, and we do have Greenwave to enforce automated tests. The critpath karma field does seem like it wouldn't serve a purpose anymore, even given automated testing.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
