Re: Removal of sln

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 04:06:31PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 12:47:24PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 04:08:09PM +0000, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 09:53:35PM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > sln (staticly linked ‘ln’) was removed from glibc recently:
> > > > 
> > > >   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531546
> > > > 
> > > > The explanation for this was:
> > > > 
> > > >   "The sln program is no longer useful, so we will not ship it anymore."
> > > > 
> > > > and it was removed from Rawhide 3 days later.
> > > > 
> > > > There are some %post scripts which still use this, notably
> > > > ca-certificates, so that's now broken.  But more to the point what do
> > > > you do if you are in a situation where you need to make a symlink to
> > > > save some core shared library on the currently running system?
> > > > 
> > > > I also don't think rather fundamental, useful and old tools like this
> > > > should be removed without discussion.
> > > 
> > > Why is normal ln not enough? It should be installed and runnable on
> > > pretty much any system, even during upgrades of glibc and other basic
> > > libraries.
> > 
> > The idea behind sln is that it works even if you've broken the libc
> > symlink.
> 
> Right. But does this really happen? In my experience, 10 years ago
> this kind of stuff happened, either because the tools were less
> reliable, or rather more likely because the human operating them
> didn't yet know how to operate them properly. I think we have all moved
> far in the direction of systems-as-cattle, and when we get to the point
> where libc is hosed, well, that's it, we provision a new installation.

The greater point was that our toolchain shouldn't make loads of
changes with minimal discussion.  This is just one example of several
which have happened recently:

 - removal of crypt
 - removal of xdr_* functions (breaking ABIs!) and rpcgen
 - adding flags which break CLANG
 - changes which break very long-standing assumptions around linking

These things need to be signalled _long_ (years) in advance and
coordinated with users.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux