Re: [ACTION NEEDED] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 17:33 +0000, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi Igor ,
> 
> On Sun, 2018-02-18 at 18:09 +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > Over this weekend I've performed scratch-mass-rebuild without having
> > gcc and
> > gcc-c++ in buildroot of all Fedora packages, many of which failed due
> > to random
> > reasons and I grepped all logs for some common errors found by
> > analyzing
> > hundreds of build logs.
> > 
> > Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:C_and_C%2B%2B#Bu
> > ildRequire
> > s_and_Requies
> > 
> > The grep output is located here:
> > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal.txt
> > 
> > Some packages might be missed due to short koji outage, broken
> > dependencies and
> > so on, but majority of real failures is below.
> > 
> > If you fixed package(s), found false positive, found missing packages
> > in list
> > or anything else -- please let me know.
> > 
> > Note to packages which use CMake buildsystem. When you have
> > project(xxx) in
> > CMakeLists.txt it checks both for C and CXX compilers. So you might
> > encounter
> > packages where you have BuildRequires: gcc and it fails on CXX
> > compiler (even
> > you think you don't need it). Solution for this is to send patch to
> > upstream
> > switching to something like project(xxx C), or if problem is opposite
> > to
> > project(xxx CXX).
> > 
> > List of packages and respective maintainers:
> > https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/gcc-removal-pkgs.txt
> 
> I support your work, but I was thinking instead one mass change detail
> by detail .

That will come, in few weeks / month.

> Why not ? one mass spec clean up with all the items ?

* Get attention from people.
* There might be false positives, so I would like people to check their
packages.
* Whoever will ignore this will get automatic fix later (but it doesn't mean
that it will be 100% correct, although will fix bbuild).
- -- 
- -Igor Gnatenko
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=E67h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux