Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2018-02-16 at 09:49 +0100, nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> It's all too easy right now for everyone to be busy with something
> else just when things break, and sometimes the authority to tell
> people "fix your builds you're blocking everyone" is needed (or even
> the authority to revert forcibly).

We do this already, using either proven packager privileges or just by
untagging builds from Rawhide.

> I suspect it would also prevent some of the release slippage Fedora
> is famed for — the slippage happens end of cycle but the delays build
> up far earlier.

I don't really see how it would. What would the release manager be
doing in this regard that is not currently being done?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux