F29 Self Contained Change: True Noarch Erlang Packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Proposed Self Contained Change: True Noarch Erlang Packages
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/TrueNoarchErlangPackages


Owner(s):
  * Randy Barlow <bowlofeggs at fedoraproject dot org>


Erlang packages are currently all installed into
%{_libdir}/erlang/lib, despite most of them being noarch packages.
This proposal is to modify Erlang to search %{_datadir}/erlang/lib in
addition to %{_libdir}/erlang/lib when searching for dependencies.



== Detailed description ==
The Erlang VM is currently hardcoded to search for dependencies in
%{_libdir}/erlang/lib (on x86_64 this is /usr/lib64/erlang/lib). Due
to this, all Erlang packages are currently compiled "archful", despite
most of them being pure Erlang and thus truly noarch. This leads to
longer build times for Erlang packages, and more storage used in Koji
and on the mirrors.
This change proposes to add an additional path to be searched by the
Erlang VM when finding dependencies at %{_datadir}/erlang/lib (on
x86_64 this is /usr/share/erlang/lib). Additionally, the build macros
will be udpated to automatically use this new path for installation
for noarch packages. "Archful" packages will continue to store their
files where they do today.


== Scope ==
* Proposal owners:
** Write a small patch for the Erlang VM to search two paths instead
of one when loading dependencies. We will attempt to get this patch
accepted upstream first, but we will then carry the patch downstream
until accepted by upstream.
** Modify the Erlang RPM macros to use the new path for noarch packages.

* Other developers:
** Any developers who are not using the Erlang install RPM macro
should modify their spec file to either use the macro, or to install
their noarch packages to the new location.

* Release engineering:
[https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6685 #6685]
** We could mass-rebuild Erlang packages, but everything should keep
working without doing a mass rebuild so it is probably not necessary
or worthwhile, unless we want to more immediately clear up a little
disk space. The recommendation is to wait until the next mass rebuild
since there will be no interruptions for existing packages, i.e., no
effort required from Releng.
** Any erlang packages that switch from being archful to being noarch
will need all their dependent packages to be rebuilt, since they will
no longer provide archful versions of themselves. However, this can be
done at the time each package switches to being noarch. This change
will not switch any particular packages to noarch.

**List of deliverables: N/A (not a System Wide Change)

* Policies and guidelines:
** Erlang packages do not have formal packaging guidelines yet, though
this document does exist:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Peter/Erlang_Packaging_Guidelines
*** We should update the WIP guidelines.

* Trademark approval:
N/A (not needed for this Change)
-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux