Re: Should we have a release manager for each release? (or, "who owns rawhide"?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2018-02-15 at 18:15 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> 
> My intention here wasn't, actually, to complain, but to figure out if
> we could do something to spread the work around a little bit -- or
> maybe to attach some recognition to what's being done, and make a clear
> process for where, say, FPgM or someone should go for status on Rawhide
> in specific.

I mean...#fedora-releng ? This is kinda what release engineering *does*
- they engineer releases. So if a release is not being engineered
optimally, go ask release engineering. I guess I'm just not seeing what
all would actually be improved by putting another fancy named position
into the loop.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux