2018-02-05 12:00 GMT+01:00 Petr Viktorin <pviktori@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On 02/05/2018 09:32 AM, Guido Aulisi wrote: >> >> Hi, >> according to latest python guides, we should avoid calling generic >> unversioned python command >> >> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Avoid_usr_bin_python_in_RPM_Build#Quick_Opt-Out) >> >> But what should we do if it's called inside waf? waf is provided >> upstream, should we patch it to call either python2 or python3, or use >> PYTHON_DISALLOW_AMBIGUOUS_VERSION=0? >> >> I got this problem in recent ardour5 rawhide builds >> (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/ardour5?collection=f28). >> Now I'm seeing that builds are back to normal and python2 has been >> downgraded. >> >> Thanks > > > Thanks for the question, and sorry for the inconvenience! > > The python2 message is, so far, only a warning. I see the log contains a > different error: "--freedesktop requires itstool > 2.0.0 to translate > files.". > Could you check if that's not causing the failure? I found that the check for itstool fails because it gets the deprecation warning as input, there's a mistake in output = subprocess.Popen("itstool --version", shell=True, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT, stdout=subprocess.PIPE).communicate()[0].splitlines() stderr is redirected to stdout, so itstool gets DEPRECATION and version [u'WARNING:'] I will report this upstream, it seems to me that the redirection of stderr is a mistake. > If the python2 message is breaking your build, then please file a bug and > set an environment variable, as described in the Change. (Do file the bug, > though – that ensures we'll contact you before we remove the workaround.) > Background: > > We do want everyone to avoid calling /usr/bin/python, but we realize it's > not always easy. That's why we added the warning -- it will allow us to grep > the logs to figure out what is using it (and why). And of course, in simple > cases it can be fixed right away. > Some tools do fail if there's extra output on stderr; that's the reason for > the "Quick Opt-Out" workaround. > > It looks like waf will be one of the tougher things to figure out. After the > mass rebuild we'll see the effect on the whole distribution, and hopefully > come up with a better strategy for bundled waf. I will file a bug for waf, if it's the correct thing to do. > -- > Petr Viktorin Many thanks for your reply Guido Aulisi _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx