-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On Wed, 2018-01-31 at 07:14 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > I re-skimmed the whole thread so I apologize if I missed it, but I have a > couple of questions: > > 1. The packaging guidelines still require the explicit use of calling > ldconfig, so even if it's not technically required, it would be against the > guidelines to remove them, correct? tibbs is working on updating guidelines[0]. > 2. Is the plan to update for all supported Fedora releases and not just > Rawhide? Otherwise we're back in conditional hell which I thought we were > trying to move away from. (Again, the suggested workflow in the wiki for > managing branches is to merge across them). If you use macro, then you should not care at all, it will evaluate to ldconfig calls on old releases and to noop on F28+. This is mentioned on Change Page. [0] https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/654 - -- - -Igor Gnatenko -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEhLFO09aHZVqO+CM6aVcUvRu8X0wFAlpxxukACgkQaVcUvRu8 X0xmuw/8CczKI4GTPB++G4Nep1g3vw2CW9X6Nc2TaukNsGD6QAIIgxbmV5xwVpbX c1IzAsjl2Zln9ft51hwrnxfOqh69lGOUWFeNmzCaRjU1UoHZ6yx96FNuytuJttcb Jd9eqsXtfus2LS8oaePulg1k4lbdVHowrvR03U3rRKY6Z6udtcwIihJXaxJ6LIVA X5Wn1wp3v99Xkk5kRwaYM9Xx38x9kX/wayAdeVW8DD6CtYJorhpMYajGXXzuCwR4 ic1S/EXQnQg+lSZjbhzvdtwsDVgYAdNs0KoOWcrC7RbeG8kSz81iG4jMVZYeVImH vqbsy3mE6i7noG7Bo4vFX0JZ5yMPXp+pON2ifvU1ZXlDdxfxpqlOL27AFz9HKrzM jiCvHHBg4fOrLMX/rR1cSqV95jxg0Dfpcih9OKkV+SRKORebCYocpb0ljzuT34pu Ay1FTFtHhCpFT3e/rgv3hgS0YygWW7iHMTz8QCNM8cN6JfO5EoVc0PJQY5wZtH+f EbFtTUTd8r81QxEB9TKoVcevsiEXhf65WEbmD5sSqWBfVsi6MY7lALZGU32EbKx4 WdOYVHIxQK8AO0mMnimM3V1osLEhZFERASy137YncKNL5OXbsuS8tzAiShqANwVv sejFhUqBOo+DGeycRgQrRoziLClZpQlUISRIkkMDFbL1W5PgGwU= =FiJi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
