Richard Shaw wrote: > Per https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539386 I've now been > bitten twice after being asked to update a package in EPEL. > > Per this version this was a patch level update but it still breaks > applications so I'm wondering if it would just be best to only supply a > static library, at least in EPEL... I can't speak for EPEL, but in Fedora I'd rather you just bump the soname and rebuild the applications using the library when it is needed. Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
