One more time: both of the newly split packages have been marked as approved on Bugzilla, but I can't get anyone to do whatever final approval is needed for the old "sustmi" GNOME Shell extensions to become two separate packages in Fedora. I started this process back in October. I'd like to be done with it now :) ~ Andrew Toskin / FAS: terrycloth > Update: I'm still working on splitting the "sustmi" GNOME Shell extension > subpackages into their own packages. I've opened an issue on the releng pagure page: > > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7124 > > I've also executed `fedpkg retire ...` for the old package on EPEL7, f27, and master. > And the package review requests for the newly split packages have passed. The Bugzilla > threads are here: > > * HistoryManager Prefix Search -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506428 > * WindowOverlay Icons -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506429 > > I *think* I might be done with my part of the process, but I haven't gotten any > feedback in a little while. Is there anything else I need to do? > > Thanks, > ~ Andrew Toskin / terrycloth > > > > I'm the RPM package maintainer for these two GNOME Shell extensions: > > > > * gnome-shell-extension-sustmi-windowoverlay-icons > > * gnome-shell-extension-sustmi-historymanager-prefix-search > > > > They're both currently subpackages of the main "sustmi" package, > because > > upstream had been developing them in a single git repository. The two shell > extensions > > have nothing to do with each other, though, and upstream finally decided to split > them > > into separate repositories. So I think it now makes sense to also split them into > separate > > packages. > > > > I'm not entirely clear on the procedure. This wiki page > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitt... > > > > talks at first about *font* packages, but otherwise seems relevant. So, I've > started > > by splitting and updating the spec files, and creating these review requests. As I > > understand it, because the packages were already accepted into Fedora, and the > extension > > code hasn't changed, just the packaging, I think all a reviewer should really > need to > > check is whether the upgrade path is sane and works properly. > > > > * HistoryManager Prefix Search -- > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506428 > > * WindowOverlay Icons -- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1506429 > > > > Please take a look, and let me know if I've missed anything. > > > > Thanks, > > ~ Andrew / terrycloth _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
