On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 14:50 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 2:21 PM, Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx > > wrote: > > On 01/25/2018 02:41 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > I think the -z defs change should be reverted. It breaks very > > > long- > > > standing expected behaviour of linkers and there's been no proper > > > justification for doing it. > > > > > > +1 > > > > This should go through a Fedora Change workflow. I am unaware of a > > Fedora > > Change for this. > > It did [1], and I'm fairly certain it was referenced on this thread > already too. > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BINUTILS2291#Scope 2016-11-15 Fedora 25 Release 2017-02-28 Branch Fedora 26 from Rawhide (Rawhide becomes future F27) 2017-07-11 Fedora 26 Release 2017-08-15 Branch Fedora 27 from Rawhide (Rawhide becomes future F28) 2017-11-14 Fedora 27 Release 2018-02-20 Branch Fedora 28 from Rawhide (Rawhide becomes future F29) Can we do branch more early ? (like Branch Fedora 27 , but not at same time of EOL of previous release because I going crazy , every time I rebuild something in rawhide it won't build because some new feature . This -z breaks openv (on python2 module), clamav (I guess , kodi , and god knows what more ... This rawhide in open since 2017-08-15 , after 5 months , we decide add this breaking feature , more gcc8 and his new lessons that abs(of unsigned ) is redundant so we won't build it . so +1 (-z defs change should be reverted) -- Sérgio M. B. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
