Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: <DKIM> Re: Re: <DKIM> Re: <DKIM> Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:40 AM,  <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> ----- Mail original -----
>> De: "Neal Gompa"
>
>>> I'm curious, what are you missing in the preamble ? As far as I can see it's all there (even though some values
>>> set to variables %gometa precomputes). I had it's right autogenerated some parts of it in the past but it's all
>>> converted to variable use now to avoid packager surprise and permit customization.
>
>> Actually, this is fine with me. This is what disturbed me a bit:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Forge-hosted_projects_packaging_automation#Packaging_examples
>
> Ah, yes the examples snip the lines that do not need specific changes for readability
> Is the … not clear enough?
> I fear that putting a full preamble would be even more confusing for some readers. Though if people disagree, I'l try to find some time to add the skipped lines back in
>

For snipping, use "[...]" notation to indicate skipped stuff. It's
hard to tell otherwise.

-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux