Re: <DKIM> Re: [Fedora-packaging] Re: <DKIM> Re: Proposed Fedora packaging guideline: More Go packaging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 9:00 AM,  <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Neal Gompa"
>
>> As long as I can do Obsoletes/Provides for the old name for the devel,
>> unit-test,
>
> BTW is anyone using the unit-test packages? Right now I do not generate them, I don't need them, and making them work with autodeps would be hairy (deploying without autodeps should be trivial however)
>
> To be honest, given all the parts current packages fail to install, I'd expect many of the current unit test packages to fail in mysterious ways, so I'm curious: what use has been found for them?
>

No idea, but I just checked, and I don't even have the unit-test
subpackage enabled on snapd, so I don't particularly care too much
there...



-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux