Leszek Matok (Lam@xxxxxx) said: > Dnia 10-02-2005, czw o godzinie 17:20 -0500, Bill Nottingham napisaÅ(a): > > Thinking about it some more, I don't see *that* much need for modularizing > > rc.sysinit; > > As stated before, I don't see the need for the 'boot' prefix. > Think about uptimed. It needs to create unique boot id upon every boot. > Then it can be started and stopped many times using service uptimed > stop/start, changing runlevels (upon bootup, too), playing with kill > etc. When I speak about modularization above, I mean I don't see reason for splitting much of the *current* rc.sysinit to separate scripts; what I'd suspect is that we'd have the current rc.sysinit do the normal stuff (drivers, fsck, remount r/w) and then run all the scripts in rcS.d. Bill
