On 01/17/2018 12:38 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 01:02:32PM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hello,
Python3 will be in the next major RHEL release. I don't mean RHEL
7.6, but with numbers higher than 7.
There are many, many packages with something like the following
if 0%{?fedora}
%define with_python3 1
%endif
If you have something like that, please change it to something like this.
if 0%{?fedora} || 0%{?rhel} > 7
%define with_python3 1
%endif
I'll say it once again, but why can't we just have
%{python2_available} and %{python3_available} macros defined in the
base system?
Mostly because we can't change RHEL.
So, how about %{python2_missing} and %{python3_available}? Is that too
ugly and inconsistent?
--
Petr Viktorin
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
