Re: yum bug or repo too borked?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 17:19 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 22:13 +0000, Rui Miguel Seabra wrote:
> > Or is it me, some how?
> > 
> > Ok, so repo is borked... I try to update in parts...
> > 
> 
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/beta/show_bug.cgi?id=147124

Thanks, although I have hit this only with yesterday's build repo.

And I've been curving around bad dependencies manually.

Regards, Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux